Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla)

Field SparrowField Sparrow distribution map

Status/Protection

Population Information

The Federal BBS information can be obtained at http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/bbs.html by clicking on Trend Estimates and selecting the species in question. All estimates are for time period (1966-2005).

Life History

Habitat Selection

Field Sparrows are a dominant species in dry upland sites such as Grassland-shrub, dry prairie, barrens, cut and burned-over areas, young conifer plantations, and woody edges. They are also common in pasture, idle grasslands, dry old fields, oak savannah (Sample and Mossman 1997), woodland openings, roadsides, and railroad right of ways (Carey, Burhans, and Nelson 1994) if proper woody vegetation is available for nesting (1-25% shrubs/saplings) (Sample and Mossman 1997). However, the population in an area decreases as trees and thickets become more dominant (Carey, Burhans, and Nelson 1994). Field Sparrows avoid suburbs preferring the countryside. They nest on the ground or in the woody vegetation <1m tall. Field Sparrow’s field size requirements are small (found in fields as small as 15 acres) (Knutson etal 2001).

Habitat Availability

Field Sparrows are a common breeder in southern and western portions of Wisconsin but are very rare in the north and east (Robbins 1991). Cut or burned-over areas and young conifer plantations are commonly nested in. Pastures and dry old fields are also common but vulnerable to conversion with the intensification of agriculture. Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) has greatly increased the amount of idle grasslands for birds to use during the breeding season (Reynolds et al. 1994 and Johnson and Igl 1995) and has been found to be used frequently by Field Sparrow (McCoy 1999) . Grassland-shrub, dry prairie, barrens, idle grasslands, and oak savannah are rare and vulnerable to conversion to row crops, or succession to forest. Further restriction is placed on these habitats requiring adequate shrub content for Field Sparrows to nest in (Sample and Mossman 1997). Woodland openings, roadsides, and railroad right of ways are fairly common and stable but the exact amount of this habitat that persists in Wisconsin is unknown.

Population Concerns

In the portions of the state within Field Sparrow nesting range, the species appears fairly common (Robbins 1991). However, Field Sparrow is still designated as a species of management concern (Sample and Mossman 1997). Sample and Mossman (1997) ranked Field Sparrows within the top 10 ranked bird species that have management priority for the state of Wisconsin. Field Sparrow nests are commonly parasitized by Brown-headed Cowbirds. These nests are often deserted reducing nest productivity. However, those birds accepting the cowbird egg have not shown lower survivorship of host young or increase in predation. McCoy et al. (1999) found that CRP fields in north central Missouri supported a stable population of Field Sparrow in at least 2 of the 3 years of their study. The population of Field Sparrows will largely depend on habitat availability. (Carey et al. 1994).

Recommended Management

Management practices that maintain open grassland while keeping shrubs will maintain Field Sparrows. Burning once every 5+ years maintains the grassland without eliminating the shrub content. Grazed pastures that maintain shrub component is also an attractive option for Field Sparrows. Frequent mowing and burning are not recommended because they reduce the necessary shrub layer (Sample and Mossman 1997), but mowing done in a way that chooses the best mix of open grass to shrub component could be more beneficial than burning. Field Sparrows are found on smaller sites, so maintain Grassland-shrub communities on smaller sites that have less opportunity for other grassland species is recommended. In addition, oak opening restorations should maintain patches of shrubs within the site for this and other shrub species.

Research Needs

Further investigation on what existing landscapes are considered a source for Field Sparrow populations is needed. Evaluating current management practices in grassland/barrens wildlife areas with respect to this and other priority species is of high priority.

Information Sources

References

Contact Info

Kreitinger, K., Y. Steele and A. Paulios, editors. 2013.
The Wisconsin All-bird Conservation Plan, Version 2.0. Wisconsin Bird Conservation Initiative.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Madison, WI.

Website by J Davis Web Design